The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation, Licensure, Accreditation, Certification and Education
Did you know that there are approximately 229,955 advanced practice nurses (APRNS) practicing in the U.S today? (Cahill and Alexander, 2014) Increasingly nurses are pursuing advanced degrees that will enable them to assume the role of an APRN. There are four distinct roles as an APRN namely, certified nurse practitioner (CNP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) or certified nurse midwife ( CNM) . As nurses and educators of the public, it is imperative that we articulate theroles and functions of these four distinct roles.
Currently there are effortsunderway to harmonize regulations and state-to-state regulatory consistency for these roles. The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation, Licensure, Accreditation, Certification, and Education was created to do just that.The purpose of the Model is to guide states and jurisdictions in implementing and monitoring the uniform licensure, accreditation, certification, education and practice of APRNS. Created in 2008, the goal is to have the Model implemented by 2015.
Briefly, the Model has seven components. States and jurisdictions can receive one point for adopting each of the seven elements for each of the four roles. (Total score 28) indicating their progress towards full-scale implementation.
Roles of APRN: ( CNP, CNS, CRNA, CNM)
Licensure : APRNS hold both an RN and APRN
Education: Graduate Education
Certification: Each APRN is required to meet certification requirements
Independent practice: APRNS should be granted full independence to practice without MD oversight
Fullprescriptive authority: APRNS should have full prescriptive authority without MD oversight or written collaborative agreement
A number of nursing organizations, schools and colleges of nursing, policy makers, health care institutions and other stakeholders , to name a few, are collaborating to facilitate the implementation of the Model. In each state, there is some activity devoted towards removing statutory, regulatory and reimbursement constraints for APRNS. On the other hand, in some states there are massive efforts to prevent an expansion of scope of practice for APRNS.
The timing of implementing the Model is particularly important, as there are opportunities to expand access to care under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In addition, APRNS are sorely needed in underserved areas where there is limited access to primary care services. As we move toward 2015, do you know where your state is on adopting these elements? Let’s stay informed, advocate as needed and join others who support the role and contributions of APRNS.
Here are a few resources that will help us stay tuned into what is happening with the Consensus Model in our respective states.
Cahill, M., Alexander, M. (2014). The 2014 NCSBN Consensus Report on APRN Regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 4(4), 5-12.
National Council State Boards of Nursing: Campaign for APRN Consensus
LACE Network Public Discussion Board
ANA Consensus Model Brief
(If link does not open immediately, copy and paste link to web browser and press enter)
Prepared by Janice Phillips PhD FAAN RN
NBNA Health Policy Committee